Click here to go to the home page
  FORUMS   ACTIVE   CHAT   GROUPS   ARTICLES   CHALLENGES REGISTER    LOGIN    CONTROL PANEL
 
Garmin Forerunner 405 first impressions & review
Garmin Forerunner 405 first impressions & review

HomeActiveGarmin


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

View leavestone's profile
China leavestone says:

@ James, I am very satisfied with GPS reception the 405 has a fast fix and on a trail run of 6 hours 15 I haven't lost signal. It is way beter than a 305 that one will lose reception several times on the same trail.

@ Jblackwell, It has said end of 3rd quater 2008 and it has said end of 4th quater and now it says end of 1st quater it seem like a windows vista story. I'm still using my wife work laptop to get the data of and I use www.trailrunnerx.com to be able to work with the data on my mac. And no i do not want to run windows!

That is also the most supide about this watch you have to connect it anyway to charge so why not ad that extra pins to download your runs. now you have an easy to lose stick wich you have to take care of.
Why not charge as a electrical toothbrush than you don't have contacts so you can swim also with the watch.
happy running
Originally posted at 8:34am, 9 February 2009. • 5 posts ( permalink )

View arild Carelius' profile
Denmark arild Carelius says:

try to use Rubitrack... it works with mac and the 405
Posted 5 months ago. • 1 posts ( permalink )
View MRComment's profile
United States MRComment says:

Calorie computation of Forerunner
405
is based on speed and distance. The new Forerunner
405CX
has an improved method of calorie computation based on your
heart rate that is more accurate than previous. To read heart rate monitor buyer guide, please visit www.coolcheapest.com/HeartRateMonitors.aspx
Posted 3 days ago. • 1 posts ( permalink )

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Would you like to respond?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).